Tuesday, 25 December 2018

Major Financial Scandals That Rocked Malaysia Before 1MDB Was Even A Thing

Major Financial Scandals That Rocked Malaysia Before 1MDB Was Even A Thing

BY SADHO RAM — 24 JUL 2016


Although the 1MDB scandal has progressively become a larger case by far.

Cover image via BBC


Following the civil forfeiture filing by the US DOJ, seeking to seize assets acquired from stolen 1MDB funds, UMNO Supreme Council member Ahmad Shabery Cheek said that the DOJ action is "nothing out of the ordinary" when it comes to the Malaysian government

"What happened is a normal matter in the country's administration. In fact, we have been faced with a situation which is bigger, like the Bumiputra Malaysia Finance (BMF) scandal," Shabery was quoted as saying by Bernama, the national news agency.

Shabery is also Agriculture and Agro-based Industries Minister.

Image viacustomstoday

The BMF scandal, which Shabery was referring to, was one of the largest financial scandals to rock the country back in the 80s.
It made headlines around the world for its RM2.5 billion collapse.

Shabery's dismissal of the US DOJ's action against 1MDB as something "normal" shows how the Malaysian political system has been, since the early 80s, in and out of a number of high-level financial scandals where public funds were used by the government for private and corporate gains.

In fact, Malaysians have seen so many financial scandals that one is bound to lose track of them. In view of which, we decided to take a brief look back at some of the major financial scandals that have hit the country.

The Maminco scandal that cost taxpayers about RM1.6 billion

Back in 1981, after Husein Onn retired from active politics and relinquished his prime minister post due to health concerns and was succeeded by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, a company called Maminco Sdn Bhd was set up to spike and control tin prices on the London Stock Exchange with loans from Bank Bumiputra (BBM).

However, it resulted in the collapse of the tin prices, with consequent huge losses to Malaysia's exchequer. Following which, the company went into debts of RM1.5 billion.

The Government then set up another company, a dummy called Makuwasa Sdn Bhd, creating new shares supposedly reserved for ethnic Malays, which were converted to the Employees Provident Fund (EPF).

The plan was to sell these cheaply acquired shares, supposedly reserved for poor bumis, at market price for a profit to cover Maminco's losses.

In fact, for a whole five years until 18 September 1986, the Malaysian Government denied that it was the mystery tin buyer in the London Metal Exchange.

During a UMNO General Assembly, Dr. Mahathir, for the first time, was forced to admit that the Government was, in fact, involved in the whole Maminco Affair.

In short, Makuwasa was created by the Malaysian Government to recoup the Government's losses from the Maminco debacle and to repay loans to Bank Bumiputra.

The Perwaja Steel scandal that resulted in RM10 billion losses

Image via青蛙 Frog

Perwaja Steel was established in 1982 as a USD465 million joint-venture between then-state-owned Heavy Industries Corporation of Malaysia Bhd., or Hicom, and the Japanese company Nippon Steel Corporation.

It was to be the centerpiece of a state-led industrialisation drive Dr. Mahathir began in the early 1980s. However, it soon became a colossal disaster.

To quote Leslie Lopez from this WSJ piece, Perwaja is Malaysia's most costly industrial failure and the biggest financial fiasco to befall Dr. Mahathir's administration.

According to the Wastage of Taxpayer Funds Report, Perwaja Steel lost RM10 billion.

The Bumiputra Malaysia Finance scandal that lost RM10 billion

It was the first major financial scandal that rocked Malaysia and the world.

In 1983, it was discovered that Bumiputra Malaysia Finance (BMF), a unit of Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd, had lost as much as USD1 billion which had been siphoned off by prominent public figures into private bank accounts.

The whole scandal involved not just corporate shenanigans and officials at the very top of the Malaysian government, but also the murder of Jalil Ibrahim, an auditor who was sent to Hong Kong by BMF’s parent company BBMB (Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd).

Ultimately, the government had to bail out the floundering BBMB amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. BBMB was eventually absorbed into CIMB.

The Deposit-taking co-operative scandal that lost RM1.5 billion

The deposit-taking cooperative (DTCs) scandal was the first get-rich-quick scheme (also known as a type of pyramid scheme) that involved 24 co-operatives, 522,000 depositors and about RM1.5 billion in deposits.

In 1986, 5 directors of 3 DTCs were charged in court, and in 1987 a further 17 directors of another 5 DTCs were also charged. The government was requested to bail out risk-taking investors, which the Malaysian cabinet eventually approved. However, the co-operative sector of the economy never recovered.

The Pan-Electric Industries scandal that lost SD480 million

Image viaGetty Images

The scandal involved a Singapore-based company, Pan-Electric Industries that collapsed in 1985 due to unsettled forward contracts, forcing the stock exchanges of both Singapore and Malaysia to shut down for three days.

Tan Koon Swan, the former president of the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), had signed an interim rescue agreement for the troubled company that had triggered a crisis on the Singapore and Kuala Lumpur stock markets.

He was jailed for two years and fined USD232,000 for his part in the financial scandal.

The Bank Negara forex scandal resulted in RM30 billion loss

The scandal took place between 1991 to 1994, when Bank Negara engaged in large-scale speculation activities in the international foreign exchange market, landing it in serious trouble and resulting in a loss estimated to be as high as RM30 billion.

It left Bank Negara splattered with red ink and implicated both Dr. Mahathir and Anwar.

Technically bankrupt, Bank Negara had to be rescued by the Ministry of Finance. However, none of the top executives in the Bank Negara Malaysia were accused of trading activities as the government fully absorbed the losses.

The MAS financial scandal resulting in losses of RM9.4 billion

Image viasinarharian

Tajuddin Ramli took a loan from a government-linked company to buy a controlling stake, as per his own admission by the instruction of Dr. Mahathir, in MAS. He bought the share much higher than the market price - RM8 per share, that were trading at RM3.50 in 1994.

MAS had cash reserves of RM600 million when he had taken over, but it accumulated losses of RM9.4 billion by the time Ramli left it in 2001. However, despite the huge loss, the government bought back the MAS shares from him at twice the market price.

The above are just a few of the major financial scandals where public funds were used or misappropriated to protect corporate allies and its own vested interest by the country's government

As Tom Pepinsky, the Associate Professor of Government at Cornell University, and Dan Slater, the Associate Professor of political science at the University of Chicago, have separately written, meaningful reform in Malaysia's political economy requires a more fundamental change to the logic of rule and stability that the BN has pursued since 1971, either by a new generation of leadership within UMNO, or by Malaysia's repressed but resilient political opposition.

About Najib Selling The Country To The Chinese

About Najib Selling The Country To The Chinese

They allege that 1MDB obtained its assets cheap from the government and sold it for a huge profit. Well, Vincent Tan also paid only RM25 million for something worth RM760 million and which would be worth billions had Abdullah and then Najib not jammed the licence.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The opposition is alleging that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is selling Malaysia to the Chinese. What they mean is ‘selling’ to the Chinese from China. It is okay if the government sells the country to Malaysian Chinese, even if it is done ‘under-the-table’ and not openly like what 1MDB is doing.

In September 2003, just one month before Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad retired as Prime Minister, the government secretly awarded the sole sports-betting license to a company owned by Chinese tycoon Vincent Tan. The price was a steal at just RM25 million when it was valued at RM760 million. At about the same time, Vincent Tan’s Bukit Tinggi resort was also awarded 420 slot machine licenses worth hundreds of millions of Ringgit.

(SEE NEWS ITEM BELOW: Gaming License Sparks Contention in Malaysia)

The following year, in 2004, the new Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi froze Vincent Tan’s sports-betting license and this angered Dr Mahathir. When Tun Abdullah refused to relent, Dr Mahathir made his move on him and in 2009 the Prime Minister was forced out of office and Najib took over.

In a ‘signal’ to Najib, Dr Mahathir said, “Kalau saya jadi kerajaan, saya luluskanlah.” Najib, however, did not heed that message and this did not please the old man one bit. Instead, Najib suspended the sports-betting license and refused to allow it to operate — which practically sealed his fate when he refused to kowtow to Dr Mahathir. Until today, Najib has refused to allow the license to proceed.

In that same month, Vincent Tan sold 70% of his gambling license in Ascot Sports to Berjaya, his own public listed company, for just RM525 million — which is considered grossly undervalued considering the estimated legal and illegal gambling industry in Malaysia is RM25 billion a year. And he sold it at RM525 million for 70% when he only paid RM25 million for 100%.

They allege that 1MDB obtained its assets cheap from the government and sold it for a huge profit. Well, Vincent Tan also paid only RM25 million for something worth RM760 million and which would be worth billions had Abdullah and then Najib not jammed the licence.

And as Dr Mahathir said, had he been Prime Minister he would approve the licence and hence help Vincent Tan make billions over 20 years, just like YTL did over 30 years and now wants the IPP concession approved for another 30 years so that he can make even more billions.

And they talk as if 1MDB is such a big deal while not seeing the elephant in the room. And even more interesting is that Muhyiddin Yassin has promised to unfreeze the licence if he takes over from Najib and becomes Malaysia’s new Prime Minister. Now that may explain why they want Najib ousted so badly.

Gaming License Sparks Contention in Malaysia

Fear of Muslim Backlash Leads Officials to Rethink Tycoon’s Concession Permit

Leslie Lopez, The Wall Street Journal

A previously undisclosed license for a potentially lucrative Malaysian gambling concession granted to gaming tycoon Vincent Tan Chee Yioun by former Premier Mahathir Mohamad is stirring controversy within the country’s government.

Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s administration is rethinking whether to allow Mr. Tan to proceed with the concession — which permits nationwide “off-site” betting on international and local sports events — for fear of a backlash from Malaysia’s majority Muslim population, according to government officials and business executives familiar with the matter.

Government officials said Ascot Sports Sdn. Bhd., a private concern wholly owned by Mr. Tan, was awarded a license for 20-year gaming concession in June 2003 by Malaysia’s Finance Ministry, then headed by Dr. Mahathir, who retired last Oct. 31.

Mr. Tan declined to comment. One Ascot executive said the company is still negotiating with the government on implementing the new business.

In September 2003, Ascot paid a 25 million ringgit ($6.6 million) fee for the license, which allows the company to run a gaming business along the same lines as U.K.’s Ladbrokes Ltd., the international betting operation owned by the Hilton Group PLC. Malaysian gaming-industry executives estimate that a sports-betting operation, offering wagers on events such as local and foreign soccer matches and horse racing, could generate annual revenue of about $1 billion.

The awarding of Ascot’s concession was never publicly disclosed. Officials in Mr. Abdullah’s government said they only learned about it earlier this year after Mr. Tan informed them of his plans to begin his new betting business.

After mulling Mr. Tan’s plans for several months, Mr. Abdullah, who also serves as finance minister, raised the gaming concession at a cabinet meeting Wednesday. Government officials and others familiar with the cabinet discussion said several ministers warned Mr. Abdullah that the new betting license could prompt sharp criticism from the country’s conservative Muslim community, in particular the opposition Islamic party known as Parti Islam Se-Malaysia, or PAS.

PAS currently rules the north-eastern state of Kelantan and directly competes with Mr. Abdullah’s United Malays National Organization for the support of the country’s ethnic Malay Muslims, who make up about 60% of Malaysia’s population.

The Islamic party has long campaigned to shut down the country’s existing licensed gaming businesses. These include a casino run by listed Genting Bhd., a lottery and six other operations involving betting on combinations of numbers. One of those six operations is controlled by Mr. Tan’s listed Berjaya Sports Toto Bhd.

“The cabinet hasn’t decided either way,” said a Malaysian official familiar with situation. “But there are concerns about giving the approval” for the new gaming concession.

Should Mr. Abdullah’s government decide to withdraw the license from Ascot, it would mark the second time that his administration has reversed a contract or license award made by his predecessor, Dr. Mahathir. Shortly after taking office in November last year, Mr. Abdullah halted a controversial 14.5 billion ringgit railway contract Dr. Mahathir had earlier awarded to businessman Syed Mokhtar Albukhary.

An Ascot executive said the betting license awarded to the company carries several conditions that could allay the concerns of the Muslim community. For one thing, he said, it prohibits Ascot from accepting wagers from Muslims. The license also stipulates that Ascot must use existing gaming outlets run by Malaysia’s number-forecast operators to sell its new products, the executive said.

Gambling is big business in Malaysia. The combined annual revenue from legal gambling operations totals about 10 billion ringgit. Industry executives estimate that illegal gambling, which is controlled largely by syndicates that accept bets on foreign and local sporting events, generates about 15 billion ringgit a year.

Mr. Tan, whose listed Berjaya Group Bhd. has interests in property, manufacturing, publishing and gaming, has long lobbied the government to legalize other forms of betting as a way to curb the illegal trade and as a means of generating additional revenue for the government through taxes. “It’s almost insane not to tap the potential tax revenue from this business,” one group executive said.

This is Mr. Tan’s second bid at introducing sports betting in Malaysia. The businessman was first awarded a license in 1987 by then-Finance Minister Daim Zainuddin. Mr. Tan and his U.K. joint-venture partner at the time, Mecca Bookmakers, began operations in 1988 with three betting outlets in Kuala Lumpur. But the business ran into trouble a year later, after the government banned Mr. Tan from opening new outlets because of political concerns ahead of an impending general election.

Mr. Tan subsequently closed his outlets and surrendered his license to the government, but not before securing the first right to resume his betting operation should the government reconsider its position at a later date.

Government officials and people close to Mr. Tan said that in June 2003, he secured his new license after convincing Dr. Mahathir and senior Finance Ministry officials that Kuala Lumpur was losing hundreds of millions of dollars in potential tax revenue to illegal gambling operations.

Monday, 24 December 2018

The Chinese Needed Malaya; Malaya Did Not Need The Chinese

The Chinese Needed Malaya; Malaya Did Not Need The Chinese

Raja Sara Petra

It irritates me like hell to read the comments in the social media that the Malays would still be living in trees and would still be eating tapioca (ubi kayu) if the Chinese had not come to Malaya in the 1800s to help develop the country. Malaysia is what it is today because of the Chinese, they keep telling the Malays.

That is not true. First of all, Malays are a seafaring race who never lived in trees. Secondly, the Chinese may have developed the towns by building bangunan batu. But that was possible only because the Malays gave the Chinese the land to build them on. If not, the Chinese would have had to build their homes and shops on stilts in water like at Pulau Ketam.

More importantly, the Chinese came to Malaya in the 1800s not to do the Malays a favour by helping to develop the country. It is because of the 1810, 1811, 1846, 1849, 1850-1875, 1876-1879, 1896-1897 and 1907-1911 famines that took 115 million lives.

Yes, 115 million Chinese starved to death over 100 years from 1810 to 1911, which was why the Chinese migrated to Malaya where there was plenty of food to eat. So, it is not true that if the Chinese had not come to Malaya the Malays would not have been able to eat. Hence please stop displaying your ignorance by posting nonsense.

Sunday, 23 December 2018

Khaled condemns Umno defectors, says they are not fighters

Khaled condemns Umno defectors, says they are not fighters


  • NATION
  • Sunday, 23 Dec 2018

PETALING JAYA: Those who leave Umno are opportunists, not fighters, says Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin.

Commenting on the recent resignations by Umno members, Mohamed Khaled said that people should not be confused between a "fighter" and an "opportunist".


"No, they are not fighters. They are those who lost in the fight. There is no value of struggle that we can expect from them.

"Those who are really in the fight are those who take responsibility," Mohamed Khaled said in a statement on Sunday (Dec 23).

"We have nothing to worry about. It is their loss, not ours.

"Desperation? Left with no choice? All these are questions that we cannot answer. It is up to us to judge," he said.

He added that the departure of these Umno leaders pushes them to redefine the meaning of "struggle".

"We need to ask ourselves where the value of struggle really lies, within money, influence, or position?

"What saddens me the most is that within all this, we are forgetting the most important thing - the people and the voters," said Mohamed Khaled.

Earlier this month, Umno deputy president Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan said the party should take a positive approach in dealing with it the departure of Umno members.

"We cannot be upset or be overly emotional.

"If that is the decision of Sabah Umno, we in the peninsula should accept it," he said in a statement on Wednesday (Dec 12).

Mohamad, who is carrying out the duties of Umno president following Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s decision on Dec 18 to step aside, said no one can compel another in such matters and that loyalty and togetherness were not something that could be traded.

Since the May 9 general election, 17 MPs have quit Umno, with many calling for Ahmad Zahid to step down due to the lack of leadership in the party. 

Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/12/23/khaled-condemns-umno-defectors-says-they-are-not-fighters/#b6ToaxAbdOJkIDif.99

Umno defectors a virus that will infect PPBM, veep says

Umno defectors a virus that will infect PPBM, veep says

Syed Jaymal Zahiid
Malay Mail


Umno vice president Datuk Seri Khaled Nordin today labelled the party’s defectors who joined PPBM as viruses that would eventually cause PPBM’s downfall. — Picture by Hari Anggara

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 23 — Umno vice president Datuk Seri Khaled Nordin today labelled the party’s defectors who joined Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM) as viruses that would eventually cause the fledgling Malay party’s downfall.

Khaled said Umno viewed the mass defection positively since the party had cleansed itself of disloyal and opportunistic leaders who only used the former ruling party to enrich themselves.

“Trust me, their departure will not make us lose sleep. In fact it would certainly make you stay awake at night,” Khaled said in a statement.

“Because they are all this while the very virus that had infected and damaged us. And viruses, no matter where they go, will cause sickness and collapse.

“I do not wish to pray for it, but I am confident that just as how the virus had turned cancerous for Umno, so shall it become the blood and flesh of PPBM,” he added.

Over 20 Umno MPs have quit the party, with most either joining PPBM or declaring political fealty to the Pakatan Harapan administration.

PPBM, a party set up by former Umno president and two-time Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, is a PH component member.

Khaled’s invective echoed the criticism levelled against PPBM by PH allies, who felt the Mahathir-led outfit had betrayed its supporters by accepting politicians with questionable credentials.

The former Johor chief minister predicted, like some of his PH counterparts, that the “virus” will infect PPBM down to the core.

“I’m confident that it’s just a matter of time before PPBM becomes just another Umno,” he said.

“You can call it Bersatu, but in reality it’s just Umno 2.0 or 3.0.”

PPBM president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin recently said the party took note of the protest against its decision to accept Umno defectors, but gave assurance that only “clean” leaders will be taken in.

Muhyiddin, who is also a federal minister and a former Umno deputy president, said PPBM will not protect members found guilty of corruption, amid claims that many Umno politicians had defected to PH to avoid punishment.

Khaled predicted that this would result in widespread corruption within PPBM, similar to Umno.

“They will bring with them the culture of money and patronage, and they will find every space or opportunity not to fight, but to profit,” he said.

“And this faction will soon take over the party once regrouped.”

PKR division chiefs blame Nurul Izzah’s resignation on ex-leader’s nepotism remarks

 PKR division chiefs blame Nurul Izzah’s resignation on ex-leader’s nepotism remarks

Mohd Farazi (centre, seated) believes Latheefa’s nepotism remarks on December 17 to be the main factor that led to Nurul Izzah’s resignation. ― Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri


PETALING JAYA, Dec 20 — Five PKR division leaders today demanded the party discipline its former central leadership member Latheefa Koya whom they blamed for Nurul Izzah Anwar’s sudden resignation from all internal and government posts this week.

Klang PKR information chief Mohd Farazi Mohd Shah believes Latheefa’s nepotism remarks on December 17 to be the main factor that led to Nurul Izzah’s resignation as party vice-president and Penang chief the very same day.

“Myself and Indera Mahkota PKR deputy chief Kamarul Hatta Mohamed Ali have lodged a written report with the party’s disciplinary board, requesting they take action,” he told a news conference at the PKR headquarters here.

Three other Selangor PKR division leaders were also present, signalling their support of disciplinary measures against Latheefa.

“We respect Latheefa’s right to air her views since the party allows its members to voice their grievances and concerns.

“But it should have been done through the proper channels without any media manipulation,” Mohd Farazi said.

He claimed Latheefa’s statements to the media publicly exposed PKR’s weaknesses.

“We are aware the rakyat is sick and tired of hearing about the issues surrounding the party leadership.

“However we will leave it up to the disciplinary board to take the appropriate steps in this matter,” Mohd Farazi added.

Kamarul Hatta said he hopes Nurul Izzah will reconsider her earlier decision and return to the post of vice-president.

“She was the vice-president not because of nepotism or favouritism, but because the party and its members selected her since we believe she is the best candidate,” he said.

In a statement last Monday, Latheefa claimed that party president Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had ignored the grassroots choice and appointed his own for several state leaders, including Selangor, Negri Sembilan and Johor.

The lawyer also claimed that Penang and Sabah division chiefs also did not support their appointed state chiefs at first, but later changed their stances after being summoned to meet Anwar.

PKR lawyer accuses Anwar of nepotism, cronyism in changes to state chiefs

 PKR lawyer accuses Anwar of nepotism, cronyism in changes to state chiefs

Latheefa warned that after a ‘scandal-ridden’ and ‘disgraceful’ internal polls, these appointments will only damage PKR’s public standing. — Picture by Choo Choy May

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 17 — The PKR top leadership, including its president Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, was today accused of practising nepotism, cronyism and favouritism following changes to the appointment of the party’s state chiefs.

Lawyer Latheefa Koya, who has often represented the party and acted for Anwar in his personal cases, accused the latter of ignoring the preferred candidates chosen by division chiefs in at least three states, naming Selangor, Negri Sembilan and Johor as examples.



“Why did they shift support to the opposite faction after meeting the president? What did he say to them?” she asked in a statement.

According to Latheefa, the division chiefs in Pahang and Sabah also did not support the appointed state chiefs Fuziah Salleh and Christina Liew initially, but changed their minds “after being summoned to meet the president”.

She claimed to have written proof from state division chiefs to show the candidates they backed were not appointed.

Latheefa conceded that the PKR president has the authority to choose the state chiefs, but pointed out that the choice is only after consultation with the division chiefs and the top leader should not brush aside the majority opinion which is contrary to the spirit of the party constitution.

Latheefa also said that barring Sarawak and Selangor, the state chiefs appointed by Anwar were known to be aligned to one of the two main factions in PKR, but did not elaborate further.

Malay Mail was also unable to reach her for comment on this point at the time of writing.

“Except in the case of Sarawak and Selangor, the state chiefs who have been appointed are known to be aligned with one of the two main factions in PKR. Why the heavy imbalance favouring one faction?

“Appointments favouring one particular faction is tantamount to cronyism, which is anathema to any reform party,” said Latheefa.

She also expressed dismay at Nurul Izzah’s appointment as Penang state chief, saying she found it “highly inappropriate” as she is Anwar’s daughter, leaving the party vulnerable to accusations of nepotism.

Latheefa said the practice of appointing close relatives to important positions should have no place in a reformist party.

PKR’s recent internal elections publicly exposed the intense rivalry between deputy president Datuk Seri Azmin Ali and his challenger Rafizi Ramli who was said to have been backed by Anwar. The party has since attempted to portray a united front, but the rift appears to be far from bridged.

Latheefa also expressed her shock and consternation that the Kelantan state chief was chosen from a new recruit who had until just three months ago been a member of political nemesis Umno.

“It’s astonishing that PKR saw nothing wrong in appointing this recent Umno crossover. Harapan parties must uphold democracy in their respective party’s internal appointments.

“PKR needs to realise that it is now part of the federal government, charged with no less a task than instituting reforms and properly governing the nation. Hence, it must uphold the highest and best democratic practices,” said Latheefa.

She warned that after a “scandal-ridden” and “disgraceful” internal polls, these appointments will only damage PKR’s public standing.

The state chiefs appointed are as follow: Perak - Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak, Negri Sembilan - Aminuddin Harun, Kedah - Datuk Johari Abdul, Sabah - Christina Liew, Kuala Lumpur - Zahir Hassan, Melaka - Halim Bachik, Johor - Hassan Abdul Karim, Terengganu - Azan Ismail, Perlis - Amran Kamarudin, Selanor - Amirudin Shari, Kelantan - Datuk Seri Mohamad Supardi Md Noor, Pahang - Fuziah Salleh, Sarawak - Baru Bian and Penang - Nurul Izzah Anwar.