So, Who Won, Clare Brown Or Hadi Awang?
Yes, that’s right, Clare wants the police to arrest me if I ever mention her name or use her photographs in Malaysia Today. But that is not bullying. When you sue her, though, that is bullying. So, is Lim Guan Eng also bullying? What about Anwar Ibrahim? What about all those other mudder-fookers and cook-sookers in Pakatan Harapan who sue you if you say anything about them? They are not also bullying?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Pakatan Harapan and Sarawak Report’s Clare Rewcastle Brown are celebrating PAS President Abdul Hadi Awang’s ‘loss’ in the defamation suit. (SEE NEWS ITEMS BELOW)
Over the last few years many defamation suits have been settled out of court. In fact, very few cases actually enter the hearing stage. So why are they ‘celebrating’ the out-of-court settlement between Hadi Awang and Clare Brown as if Clare won and Hadi lost?
Hadi’s suit has served its purpose and is no longer required since GE14 is now over and PAS won the two states it wanted
Bodoh sangat kah?
And what does Clare mean when she says she feels vindicated? Has she published the evidence to support her allegation that former Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak paid PAS RM90 million? Where’s the evidence? Show us the evidence! Publishlah!
Cakap banyak tapi tak tunjuk bukti — sebab yang sebenarnya takde bukti pun.
Robert Kuok sent me TWO legal letters and wanted to sue me twice for defamation. Finally, he dropped both cases and did not proceed. Does this mean I won and Robert Kuok lost? Can I say I have been vindicated and therefore what I alleged against Robert Kuok is true?
The previous Attorney-General, Mohamed Apandi Ali, said he was going to sue me but finally he backed down and did not. Does that mean I have been vindicated and what I alleged is 100% true?
Can I also say Apandi is guilty and I have been vindicated?
And, today, Apandi Ali has been removed as AG. Is that proof what I alleged against him is true after all? Can I scream and shout that I have been vindicated, like what Clare is doing?
I called Anwar Ibrahim an arse-bandit and he does not dare sue me. I said Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Tun Daim Zainuddin stole RM200 billion of the rakyat’s money and they do not dare sue me.
I accused Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim of corruption. I also accused Mohd Isa Abdul Samad of corruption. Both did not dare sue me and now both are facing charges for corruption. Is that proof what I alleged against them is true after all? Can I scream and shout that I have been vindicated, like what Clare is doing?
I have accused Anwar, Mahathir and Daim of robbing the country but none of them dare sue me as well
It appears that my track record proves that all those who I accuse of doing something wrong (such as Azeez, Isa and Apandi), and who do not dare sue me (such as Azeez, Isa and Apandi), are really guilty in the end. That seems to be what my track record proves. Hence, based on this track record, can I say that proves what I said about Robert Kuok is also true?
Yes, Pakatan Harapan dan Clare Brown, janganlah bodoh sangat. Dan jangan cuba memperbodohkan orang ramai. Just because the case was settled out of court don’t try to tell us that Clare won and Hadi lost.
Hadi had his reasons for settling out of court and I know the reason why. It was all a pre-GE14 election strategy and that strategy paid off. Is not PAS now in control of two states when PAS was supposed to win zero seats like what Rafizi Ramli predicted?
Anyway, why did Clare agree to the out-of-court settlement? If what she said is true then she should have refused to settle out of court and instead tell Hadi, “See you in court, pukimak!”
Since Robert Kuok dropped TWO cases against me can I say I am right and that I have been vindicated?
And Clare said, “If anyone thought they could bully me with legal bullying, they were wrong.”
But was it not she who bullied me with legal bullying? In fact, she even sent the police to my house to threaten to arrest me if I write about her, mention her name in my article, or inset any of her photographs in Malaysia Today.
That’s not bullying?
Yes, that’s right, Clare wants the police to arrest me if I ever mention her name or use her photographs in Malaysia Today. But that is not bullying. When you sue her, though, that is bullying. So, is Lim Guan Eng also bullying? What about Anwar Ibrahim? What about all those other mudder-fookers and cook-sookers in Pakatan Harapan who sue you if you say anything about them? They are not also bullying?
*********************************************************************************
Rewcastle-Brown on Hadi dropping suit: I feel utterly vindicated
(The Star) – A Sarawak Report story that originally led to a defamation suit by PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang will remain online after the suit was settled out of court.
When contacted, Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown said the article was still online and would remain so because Abdul Hadi had dropped the suit.
“He dropped his complaint. People can make of that what they want.
“I invite anyone to revisit the article, and it’s still online.
“It is no longer being contested,” she said.
Rewcastle-Brown maintained her silence on the terms of the settlement, saying that it was agreed that they would stay private.
On the decision to settle the suit, she said she felt “utterly vindicated”.
“If anyone thought they could bully me with these legal bullying, they were wrong,” she said.
If suit settled out of court, was Sarawak Report right? Sepang MP suggests
(Malay Mail Online) – Sepang MP Mohamed Hanipa Maidin has clarified today that a settlement out of court does not mean that PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang has won in his defamation suit against Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown.
The deputy law minister also pointed out that since Abdul Hadi did not win in his suit, it cannot be ascertained whether the portal’s report that the Islamist party received RM90 million from rival party Umno was slander.
“When the case did not proceed and was retracted, that means it did not count as a win. When you don’t win, so it cannot be said that what SR published was slander,” the Parti Amanah Negara leader wrote on his Facebook page, using the portal’s initials.
“What more when the settlement terms that I read, there was no such line where SR retracted its allegation or apologised, which could be seen as a concession or admission that what it published was slander.”
No comments:
Post a Comment