Sunday, 12 August 2018

Najib: If I Was Involved, My Wife (Rosmah) Would Have Done Something

WORLD OF BUZZ MALAYSIA

Najib: If I Was Involved, My Wife (Rosmah) Would Have Done Something

Published 2 years ago on December 11, 2016

By Ling Kwan

With the amount of publicity he’s been getting, it’s not uncommon for Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak to appear on the front page of newspapers, and usually in a distasteful accusation. Being in the limelight, news involving him are bound to make headlines on social media. That’s the life of a politician.

It’s no surprise that he too suffers from the backlash of unwanted social media attention, especially with allegations slapped on by the opposition parties, usually linking him to cases of corruption, money laundering, and even homicide.

As the current UMNO President, he stated that the opposition parties were fabricating stories that puts him under a bad light to instigate Malaysians. Enuf is enuf! Najib said that he was wildly accused by irresponsible parties for having been involved with the murder of Althantuya Shariibuu in 2006, in which he claimed that he had no affiliation with the victim.

“If I was involved, never mind the police, my wife would have done something.”

To clear his name and brush off the allegations, Najib has taken a vow in mosque. He said,

"The stories still keeps coming up, but there is no evidence at all.”

Najib went on saying that his name was brought up again during the murder of Kevin Morais that took place in 2015. Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Anthony Kevin Morais was brutally murdered in an oil palm plantation in Perak. His body was stuffed in a barrel, and then later cemented in order to dispose the body.

“Then there is the story of the ring. After that, they said they were joking.”

Rosmah was accused of buying a RM73 million diamond ring in 2015 which was later proved to be a lie after the diamond ring company clarified that Rosmah did not purchase the diamond ring. Najib said that the damage was done even though the issue was clarified later. He said it when wrapping up the 201 UMNO General Assembly at Putrajaya World Trade Centre.

Najib also fired at Tun Mahathir for purposely stirring up stories about the debt-ridden 1 Malaysian Development Berhad (1MDB) as though the company had made no contribution to the economy of Malaysia. 1MDB is the brainchild of Najib Razak bearing the mission of assisting the government to propel Malaysia to greater heights.

According to NST, Tun Mahathir initially said that 1MDB has lost RM42 billion and then changed the figure to RM27 billion. Bro, RM27 billion still a lot weh… “Now that the issue (regarding 1MDB) has been answered, he has gone quiet.”

Gone quiet, since when?

To highlight the contribution of 1MDB, Najib said that 1,200 imams and village heads are able to perform haj every year because of 1MDB. So after all, 1MDB has done some good for the Malaysians, and not just make exaggerated headlines in various countries for its alleged funding discrepancies.

“If there are weaknesses, if there are faults, please correct them.”

He then challenged Tun Mahathir to sue Barry Wain, the author of “Malaysian Maverick: Mahathir Mohamad in Turbulent Time” which highlighted all the issues happened during his 22-year reign as Malaysia Prime Minister.

“There were more issues during the time of Dr Mahathir. The independent power producer (IPP) issue, the toll issue, the privatization of Malaysia Airlines, Perwaja, Forex. I know the issues,” said Najib.

To further prove his point against Tun Mahathir, Najib cited from the book by Barry Wain that there was a RM100 billion leak. He questioned why Tun Mahathir did not sue Barry if it is not true.

“When it comes to me, (he) will ask me to sue. When it is him, he does not sue,” he said.

The last challenge of Najib to Tun Mahathir was to hold a convention for Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia since he is the chairman, and see whether the attendance will be as good as the one at UMNO General Assembly.

Thanks to these two heavyweight politicians, the political scene in Malaysia has definitely reached a new level, and entertaining all the same.

Here’s What Najib Has to Say About the New Govt in His Latest FB Post

WORLD OF BUZZ MALAYSIA

Here’s What Najib Has to Say About the New Govt in His Latest FB Post

Published 3 months ago on May 24, 2018

By Sheralyn Tan

So many things are happening in our country where most of them revolve around Najib who is being questioned on matters regarding the 1MDB case. With all of this going on, he has resorted to using Facebook to get his comment in on the decisions made for the country.

Yesterday night (May 23), at 11.45pm, former prime minister Najib Razak took to Facebook to express his disagreement with how the new government is being run by the ruling party, Pakatan Harapan. He reminded PH to distinguish between political narrative and fact after they had claimed that the country’s debt is currently above RM1 trillion, reported The Star.

“Mixing them will create doubts on the credibility of our numbers and the professionalism of the institutions that were involved in preparing them, governed by Malaysian laws and international standards,” he said.

On Wednesday (May 23), Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad mentioned that Malaysia’s debt has now amounted to RM1 trillion, or is 65 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Responding to this statement, Najib said that it would only unsettle the financial markets, alarm credit rating agencies and investors’ confidence in Bank Negara Malaysia. In his Facebook post, Najib also pointed out that the Bursa Malaysia index fell 40.78 points or 2.21 per cent on Wednesday (May 23), while the Indonesian stock index saw an increase of 0.71 per cent. “Surely this fall would affect our funds such as EPF and PNB and could lower the dividend rates for its members for the year,” he said.

“Similarly, issuing statements that we should not worry about our country’s sovereign credit ratings being downgraded will result in further rocking the confidence in our institutions.”

He then went on to add that a downgrade in the nation’s sovereign ratings would also result in higher debt financing costs of RM10 billion per year, and that that it could cause banks which borrowed from international markets to encounter further losses. He said that making such remarks could lead to large capital outflows from foreign investors and cause our Ringgit to weaken.

“While you may want to slander and put all the blame on me to give a perception of a dire financial position to justify why you cannot deliver on your manifesto promises and to massively cut the civil service, you must remember that the country and our people comes first.”

“You can also issue misleading statements on 1MDB or tell half the story about it to blame me but the time to play politics is over,” he said.

“Words spoken while in such positions of power result in actual losses to the country and the people, as was proven today in the stock market. It is no longer just about votes anymore,” he added.

Najib’s Facebook post immediately garnered a multitude of reactions from Malaysian netizens within minutes, and they were not very happy with what he said.

A Stunning, Sudden Fall for Najib Razak, Malaysia’s ‘Man of Steal’

A Stunning, Sudden Fall for Najib Razak, Malaysia’s ‘Man of Steal’

By Hannah Beech, Richard C. Paddock and Alexandra Stevenson

May 15, 2018

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Just a few months ago, the political machine led by Najib Razak, the gilded prime minister of Malaysia, appeared so indestructible that a multibillion-dollar corruption scandal seemed unlikely to derail it. The end came so quickly, so completely, that even his opponents were shocked.

For nearly a decade, Mr. Najib, 64, had unfettered control of his nation’s courts and coffers. His party had thrived by unfailingly delivering huge cash handouts at election time. The media was at his disposal; journalists he didn’t like, he shut down. Political foes were shoved into prison.

The pampered son of a prime minister and nephew of another, Mr. Najib enjoyed the friendship of President Trump, who after playing golf with him in 2014 gave him a photo inscribed, “To my favorite prime minister.” Last year, Mr. Trump hosted Mr. Najib at the White House, even as the United States Justice Department accused him of taking Malaysian state money.

But his authority suddenly evaporated in the early hours on May 9, after Malaysia’s national elections delivered a commanding majority to the opposition, now led by the political titan who had once lifted Mr. Najib to power: the 92-year-old Mahathir Mohamad.

The opposition was fractious, and remains so, but it was galvanized by a single purpose: to deliver the ouster of Mr. Najib to an electorate furious at his excesses and emboldened by social media even as news outlets were being muzzled.

Now, Mr. Najib is suddenly vulnerable to criminal charges at home, as well as a reinvigorated effort by the Justice Department as it pursues billions of dollars missing from 1Malaysia Development Berhad, a state investment fund supervised by Mr. Najib for years.

The details released from that investigation in the past three years painted a lurid picture of a Malaysian leader and his family members and friends living high on diverted public money.

Prosecutors say that hundreds of millions of dollars from the fund appeared in Mr. Najib’s personal account and was spent on luxury items, including a 22-carat pink diamond necklace, worth $27.3 million, for his wife. In all some $7.5 billion was stolen from the fund, prosecutors say, and spent on paintings by Monet, Van Gogh and Warhol and others worth over $200 million; on luxury real estate in the United States; and even on a megayacht for a family friend, Jho Low, who reveled in his Hollywood connections.

Those accusations, and others, became grist for social media outrage in Malaysia, frequently on private WhatsApp groups, but it seemed Mr. Najib still underestimated how much he was losing: a public that still valued some semblance of moderation, his once unbreakable Malay power base, even family members.

Mr. Najib’s stepdaughter, Azrene Ahmad, took to Instagram on Friday with an emotional condemnation of him and her mother, Rosmah Mansor, who had become widely known here for piling up designer labels, garlands of jewelry and a multimillion-dollar handbag collection that more than rivaled the shoe fetish of Imelda Marcos, the former first lady of the Philippines.

“Today marks the end of a day of tyranny that many have prayed for,” Ms. Azrene wrote, describing how she had “witnessed many trespasses, deals and handshakes these two made for the benefit of power and to fuel their appetite for greed.”

“The numerous offshore accounts opened to launder money out of the country for their personal spending,” she continued, cataloging her accusations against them. “The steel safes full of jewels, precious stones and cash amassed. Being made a cash mule.”

Mr. Najib’s brother, Nazir Razak, joined in, implicitly casting his brother’s ouster as a chance for progress. “Malaysia needs major recalibration, but all attempts under the old order failed,” he wrote on social media. “Now you can!”

Even the state-linked news media, which had spent years writing slavish articles describing Mr. Najib’s wisdom and Ms. Rosmah’s charitable ventures, dropped the multiple honorifics that once preceded his name.

By Saturday, a travel blacklist foiled Mr. Najib’s attempt to leave for Indonesia with his wife.

Mr. Mahathir, who was sworn in as prime minister on Thursday, has called Mr. Najib a thief and said he must face the consequences of his actions. “High or low, all are subject to the law,” Mr. Mahathir said Sunday at a news conference.

“This totally changes everything,” said Ren McEachern, a former supervisory special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation who specialized in international corruption. “Now that he’s out of office, there could be an appetite for criminal charges.”

Further, Mr. Najib’s removal from office is bringing new vigor to efforts by the Justice Department to pursue him, according to a person with direct knowledge of the investigation but who is not authorized to speak publicly. The department declined to comment on the case for this article.

After his defeat, Mr. Najib posted a Twitter message that was at least partly contrite. “I apologize for any shortcomings and mistakes,” he wrote, even as he maintained that “the best interests of Malaysia and its people will always be my first priority.”

But the saga of Najib Razak is one of astonishing insatiability and unaccountability. And it is an account of a political party — the United Malays National Organization, which Mr. Najib led — that teethed on graft and patronage and collapsed under the weight of its own immoderation.

“For a long time, elites across the region have enjoyed a culture of impunity,” said Donald Greenlees, an authority on Southeast Asia at Australian National University. “There is no doubt that the decades of mostly one-party rule, the capture of state institutions, particularly the judiciary, and the taming of the media led Najib to believe he was untouchable.”

Mr. Najib’s downfall was a vanishingly rare event in a region where democracy has retreated in recent years. In Malaysia, as in other places across Southeast Asia, elections had been deployed only to legitimize those in power. Yet without a single shot fired or a threat of a coup uttered, Mr. Najib was toppled.

“The day I left home I left you a warning,” Ms. Azrene, his stepdaughter, wrote on Instagram. “There will come a reckoning when the people will punish you for your trespasses on them. There will come a day when God will punish you for your trespasses, the very people you swore to protect.”

Malaysian police officers seizing equipment from the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) office in Kuala Lumpur in 2015. Billions of dollars disappeared from the state fund.CreditMohd Rafsan

The Flawed Heir

Mr. Najib’s pedigree was impeccable, and from an early age he seemed destined to take the helm at the United Malays National Organization, which counts the betterment of the country’s ethnic Malay majority as its founding mission.

Educated at elite British schools, he acquired a chic English accent and a fondness for fine tailoring. Unlike his onetime mentor, Mr. Mahathir, he did not have an instant rapport with the rural Malay Muslim base, and early in his political career he struggled to speak Malay.

Still, the legacies of Mr. Najib’s father, who was the second prime minister of Malaysia, and his uncle, who was the country’s third, helped make up for his lack of grass-roots appeal. In interviews, Mr. Najib was smooth, gracious and somewhat distant.

“Najib grew up thinking that leading the country was his birthright,” said Rafizi Ramli, a top strategist for the opposition that ousted Mr. Najib and the National Front coalition. “He doesn’t realize that you have to earn the people’s trust and maintain the people’s trust. He is completely removed from Malaysia, the real Malaysia.”

Mr. Najib’s father, Abdul Razak, who also served as prime minister of Malaysia. Mr. Abdul died in 1976.CreditRolls Press, via Getty Images

But his reputation was tarnished years before he became prime minister in 2009.

In 2006, when Mr. Najib was deputy prime minister, the Mongolian mistress of one of his advisers, Abdul Razak Baginda, was killed, blown up by military-grade explosives. Two of Mr. Najib’s bodyguards were eventually convicted in her murder.

French investigators are still examining whether Mr. Najib, during his time as defense minister, might have personally profited from around $130 million in kickbacks related to a transaction for French submarines. Before she was killed, the Mongolian woman, Altantuya Shaariibuu, claimed she was owed half a million dollars for brokering that deal.

The biggest scandal of all exploded in 2015 when opposition politicians and muckraking journalists questioned what had happened to billions of dollars that had disappeared from 1Malaysia Development Berhad, the country’s state investment fund.

Mr. Najib oversaw the fund, known as 1MDB, and unveiled it in 2009 as a surefire way to bring further prosperity to Malaysians through smart foreign investments and development projects.

In 2016, the United States Justice Department dropped a bombshell: A person it referred to as Malaysian Official 1 had siphoned $731 million from 1MDB. Officials privately confirmed that Mr. Najib was Malaysian Official 1.

The Justice Department’s accusations continued: In total, over $4.5 billion in 1MDB funds was laundered through American banks, enriching Mr. Najib, his family and friends, prosecutors said.

It said $250 million went for a megayacht, complete with a helicopter pad and movie theater, built for Jho Low, a financier friend of Mr. Najib’s stepson, Riza Aziz. Mr. Low is accused of being central to the plot, and federal prosecutors said he used 1MDB funds to buy the actor Leonardo DiCaprio a $3.2 million Picasso painting for his birthday. The Australian model Miranda Kerr received $8 million in jewelry. (Both have since returned the gifts.)

Mr. Najib explained that $681 million deposited in his personal bank account was a gift from a Saudi patron. In 2015, after Malaysia’s attorney general gathered evidence of Mr. Najib’s involvement in 1MDB and seemed poised to press charges, Mr. Najib fired him. Subsequent Malaysian government investigations cleared Mr. Najib of any wrongdoing.

Malaysians were accustomed to a certain amount of grease in the country’s political system, but the extravagant sums linked to the 1MDB scandal shocked the public. United States federal prosecutors called the money-laundering scheme “massive, brazen and blatant.”

Mr. Najib moved to shut down critical news reports, or to spin it in the state media outlets. But he could not block everything.

News outlets including The Sarawak Report blog and the Malaysia-based newspaper The Edgejoined The Wall Street Journal at the lead of the race to expose each detail. (The Edge was shut down at one point for three months, and The Sarawak Report website is still blocked in Malaysia.)

The Malaysian political establishment wondered how the son of a famously ascetic prime minister had grown so venal and careless. “If you want to steal this kind of money, why would you put it in your own account?” said James Chin, a Malaysian who is the director of the Asia Institute at the University of Tasmania. “It shows such arrogance.”

Mr. Najib’s wife, Rosmah Mansor, in 2014, leaving the Time Warner Center in New York, the site of one of their homes. Ms. Rosmah is known for her overseas shopping trips and a multimillion-dollar collection of Hermès Birkin handbags.CreditMichael Appleton for The New York Times

Blame the Wife

As the public grew angrier about the excesses, Ms. Rosmah became a frequent target of ire.

Her habit of taking chartered shopping expeditions to Europe and Australia, presumably at the expense of Malaysian taxpayers, became social-media fodder. Her Hermès Birkin handbag collection, one broker said, was worth at least $10 million.

“Rightly or wrongly, Rosmah was vilified as the major partner in the corruption and scandals associated with the prime minister,” said Lim Teck Ghee, a public policy analyst in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia’s capital.

In 2015, when Mr. Najib’s and Ms. Rosmah’s daughter married the nephew of President Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan, guests were astonished by their lavish wedding celebrations. Mr. Mahathir, who attended one party, recalled seeing soldiers lugging at least 17 trunks loaded with luxury gifts for the guests. “I had never seen that, even at royal weddings,” he said in an interview with The New York Times in 2016.

Fazley Yaakob, the husband of Mr. Najib’s stepdaughter, offered another story, which he recounted on Instagram after Mr. Najib lost the election. Before the two were married, Mr. Fazley wrote, Ms. Rosmah hired a witch doctor to assess the suitability of the union. The witch doctor warned against the marriage because Mr. Fazley, unlike others, would be able to resist Ms. Rosmah’s supernatural powers.

Mr. Najib and Ms. Rosmah in 2000.CreditLeo Chan/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The pair married anyway. “All hell broke loose right after,” wrote Mr. Fazley, without detailing exactly what happened.

Mr. Najib was called the “Man of Steal” by Zulkiflee Anwar Ulhaque, one of Malaysia’s top cartoonists, who caricatured Ms. Rosmah with a giant diamond ring on her plump finger. Mr. Najib’s reaction was unforgiving. Mr. Zulkiflee, who is known by the pen name Zunar, was charged with nine counts of sedition and still could face up to 43 years in prison.

This year’s Election Day, Mr. Zulkiflee said, was “the happiest moment of my life,” and he hopes the charges will now be dropped.

During the campaign, Mr. Mahathir, who said he came out of retirement two years ago to join the opposition because he was so shocked by the cloud of corruption around Mr. Najib, succeeded in harnessing public angst over the rising cost of living to financial scandals linked to the prime minister. One that particularly resonated with rural Malays, some of whom ended up casting swing votes in favor of the opposition, was a farm subsidy program that, by some accounts, was missing around $750 million. Mr. Najib oversaw that program.

Those defections proved critical, though there was no assurance that Mr. Mahathir could still command his old popularity.

“1MDB was a key factor in the election result,” said Mr. Lim, the public policy analyst. “The long-running scandal became indelibly associated with the endemic high-level corruption in the country.”

Electronic advertising in Kuala Lumpur before the election promoted Mr. Najib and his coalition. Mr. Najib had predicted another victory at the polls this month.CreditUlet Ifansasti/Getty Images

Failed Containment

Yet even as public outrage intensified, Mr. Najib seemed curiously removed from reality. In omnipresent campaign billboards, he hogged the limelight, his grin and upturned hands evoking less a statesman than a salesman. Malaysian voters were supposed to acquiesce to whatever deal he had on offer.

Mr. Mahathir said he had a falling out with Mr. Najib because of his protégé’s insistence that “cash is king,” both in politics and governance.

Under Mr. Najib’s leadership, the party ensured victory in 2013 by passing out hundreds of millions of dollars to party leaders to give to voters, according to his own aides.

The strategy was similar for 2018, analysts said, and Mr. Najib had predicted that the governing coalition would do even better in this month’s elections than it had in 2013, before the 1MDB scandal broke out.

On the eve of campaigning, Mr. Najib’s information minister, Salleh Said Keruak, bragged that the United Malays National Organization, or UMNO, would win easily, and that the party had access to a trove of government data on Malaysian voters. “We have it all at our fingertips,” he said.

Mr. Salleh wasn’t the only one to miscalculate. Local polling agencies predicted the elections would go to the National Front coalition, which is dominated by UMNO. Across the country, public flag displays supporting the National Front vastly outnumbered those of the opposition Alliance of Hope.

Still, there were murmurings of discontent. In a first, Malaysia’s navy chief reminded his sailors that the vote was secret so they should choose freely.

And though Mr. Trump met with Mr. Najib at the White House last September, the effort by a former top Republican operative, Elliott Broidy, to get them together again for golf failed, despite Mr. Broidy’s assurance to the White House chief of staff in a leaked email that he knew Mr. Najib well. Mr. Najib didn’t even get a customary photo op during the visit.

A closed road outside Mr. Najib’s mansion, in the background, in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday.CreditAndy Wong/Associated Press

In the final months of the campaign, Mr. Najib fell back on tried-and-true money politics. The day before the election, he promised that Malaysians 26 and younger would not have to pay income tax if his coalition prevailed. Earlier, he offered significant pay raises to civil servants, who are mostly ethnically Malay rather than from Malaysia’s Chinese or Indian minorities.

“That has always been his style: When faced with difficulties, throw goodies at them,” said Oh Ei Sun, an analyst based in Kuala Lumpur and a former political secretary to Mr. Najib.

Other tactics were more iron-fisted. Shortly before campaigning began, Mr. Najib’s party pushed through a so-called fake news law that was the first in the world to use Mr. Trump’s rejoinder as it criminalized publishing or circulating misleading information. The law, critics feared, could land anyone who criticized Mr. Najib in prison for up to six years. His government also designed a broad gerrymandering scheme that diminished the impact of minorities who were unlikely to vote for him.

None of these efforts worked. “The Najib brand is toxic,” said Mr. Chin of the University of Tasmania. “There was no way he could run away from this.”

On Sunday, Mr. Najib and Ms. Rosmah were still secluded in their mansion in Kuala Lumpur. A bodyguard at their home, who asked not to be identified in the press out of fear of reprisals, said that the stream of confidants who once knocked at their door had stopped. Even their housekeeper, he said, had deserted them.

Hannah Beech and Richard C. Paddock reported from Kuala Lumpur, and Alexandra Stevenson from Hong Kong. Sharon Tan and Austin Ramzy contributed reporting from Kuala Lumpur, and David D. Kirkpatrick from London.

A version of this article appears in print on May 16, 2018, on Page A10 of the New York edition with the headline: The Spectacular Fall of Malaysia’s ‘Man of Steal’. 

Saturday, 11 August 2018

Just Lost an Election? Join the Winning Side


Just Lost an Election? Join the Winning Side

By Chin-Huat Wong

Mr. Wong is a Malaysian political scientist.

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Call them “hoppers,” call them “frogs,” as soon as the surprise outcome of Malaysia’s recent election became clear, politicians from the losing parties started jumping over to the winners’ side. The moment the long-ruling coalition Barisan Nasional was voted out of power on May 9, it started to disintegrate.

But even with Pakatan Harapan, a collection of long-suffering underdog parties, now in charge, the mass defections already are endangering Malaysia’s democracy: The system risks swinging from being dominated by one overbearing coalition to being dominated by another overbearing coalition.

When ballot counting ended on May 10, the morning after the election, Pakatan Harapan (and its regional ally in the state of Sabah) had won 122 out of 222 seats in the lower house of Parliament. That camp now controls 126 seats, after members of Barisan Nasional and putative allies jumped ship.

The uptick may seem marginal, but it reveals a much broader trend that has troubling implications.

May 9 was also voting day for the assemblies of 12 of Malaysia’s 13 states. According to the initial results, Pakatan Harapan won five of those, Barisan Nasional won two (down from nine) and the Islamist party known as Pas won two. No single party won a majority in Kedah, Perak or Sabah.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet soon enough Pakatan Harapan was able to form governments in all three states — in Perakand, most spectacularly, Sabah, that was thanks to defections from Barisan Nasional. In fact, in Sabah, on the island of Borneo, two chief ministers were sworn in within 48 hours: Barisan Nasional won 29 of the 60 seats in the state assembly and formed a coalition government with a local party — until six of its members defected, allowing Pakatan Harapan and its local ally to take over.

Even the 13th state, Sarawak, also on Borneo, which didn’t vote on May 9 because it held its elections in 2016, might swing: Barisan Nasional remains in charge for now, but its local allies reportedly are contemplating forming an independent coalition.

You have 4 free articles remaining.

Subscribe to The Times

Defections are nothing new in Malaysian politics, and their dangers are familiar. Civil-society activists and members of Pakatan Harapan itself are now arguing that crossovers violated the popular mandate voters had handed to their chosen candidates, whatever the camp. They can also corrupt, the former minister Rais Yatim has warned: “If PH accepts into its fold everyone who feels pushed into a corner, then it would create BN 2.0, with all its destructive behavior.”

Worse, postelection defections threaten democracy by suppressing political competition both inside the new ruling coalition and outside it — and that in turn often induces the opposition to adopt more hard-line positions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many Malaysians vote according to their ethnicity, for parties they feel represent them on that basis. But since not all parties stand a chance of getting elected in every constituency, they have to forge long-term alliances among themselves and then convince supporters to vote for their allies. This arrangement gives party leaders a lot of power, especially in their selection of local candidates, and selection decisions often hinge more on loyalty than merit — undermining the a coalition’s electability in the long run.

As its competitiveness waned over the years, Barisan Nasional — particularly its leading party, the United Malays National Organization, or UMNO — compensated with extensive patronage (barely veiled attempts to buy votes) and repression (blatantly trying to disadvantage opposition supporters). To overcome infighting within its ranks, it maneuvered to add seats in federal and state legislatures and redelineate voting districts to its advantage. It pacified party members who weren’t put up as candidates with government appointments or contracts.

So, yes, Barisan Nasional was corrupt and illiberal — but it became that way partly in response to structural features in Malaysia’s political system that, when mapped onto the country’s ethnic and religious divisions, naturally, if paradoxically, create a distance over time between parties in broad coalitions and their constituents. Like the United States and Britain, Malaysia has a first-past-the-post voting system. But in a society as diverse and as divided as this one — Muslim-Malays make up about 60 percent of the population, and Chinese and Indian combined a little less than 30 percent — its operation can have perverse effects.

Another example: Coalition politics under Barisan Nasional pushed opposition parties to harden their positions as they struggled to remain viable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take the evolution of Pas, the main Islamist party, over the years, as it responded to UMNO’s claim to be the sole party capable of defending the interests of Muslim-Malays. Race riots in 1969 brought Pas and UMNO together — only for Pas to pull out of Barisan Nasional in the late 1970s as UMNO wrested away its stronghold state, Kelantan.

By 1981, Pas was countering UMNO’s Muslim-Malay nationalism by attacking the ruling coalition for preserving a “colonial constitution, infidel laws and pre-Islamic rules” — in effect challenging the very legitimacy of modern Malaysia as a nation-state. And it intensified its calls to apply Shariah throughout the country.

In response, Mahathir Mohamad (now the new prime minister; then also prime minister, but under the UMNO banner) enlisted Anwar Ibrahim (today the leader of Pakatan Harapan’s anchor party, but at the time a charismatic young Islamist also with UMNO) to rebrand UMNO as the standard-bearer of a modernist form of Islamization — promoting Islamic universities, Islamic banking and Islamic bureaucracies.

ADVERTISEMENT

One result of this tug of war over how to promote Islam in politics is that if the notion of making Shariah the official law of Malaysia was a fringe idea in the late 1980s, by 2013, 86 percent of Malaysian Muslims supported it, according to a study by the Pew Research Center.

Some people celebrate this month’s election as marking Malaysia’s move away from communal politics, pointing to the fact that Pakatan Harapan, a diverse grouping of parties representing different ethnic groups, has downplayed communal issues to focus on national matters, like corruption and an unpopular tax on goods and services. But they are overlooking some facts: Pas secured nearly 18 percent of the popular vote, 18 seats in the lower house of Parliament and control of two state governments.

Though Pas had done better at the federal level in previous elections, these are impressive results considering that it joined forces with Barisan Nasional in recent years: It appears not to have been too tainted by the association. Pas now has little reason to moderate its core stances — and UMNO may have more reason to endorse them.

Likewise, Barisan Nasional’s indigenous parties in Sabah and Sarawak may be tempted to double down on their traditional appeal to historical grievances in the two Bornean states — poverty, marginalization and exploitation by the central government — and harden their calls for greater autonomy and someday perhaps even separatism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reacting to such concerns, Mr. Mahathir has recently said that new defectors would not automatically be granted formal membership in Pakatan Harapan. But that measure will only slow down, rather than stop, Pakatan Harapan’s slide toward becoming another overbearing ruling coalition, unless a healthy opposition can be groomed outside Pakatan Harapan.

It is unlikely that Barisan Nasional as we know it will last through the year: not only because of its searing loss in the election, but also because of the likely fallout ahead from the scandals embroiling the former prime minister Najib Razak. Much may depend on whether UMNO can oversee a changing of the guard during its next party election, currently scheduled for June 30.

But much more depends on Pakatan Harapan.

After the 1970s, Barisan Nasional essentially turned Malaysia into an electoral one-party state. To prevent that from occurring again, the new government will eventually have to dismantle the country’s winner-takes-all system. A proportional electoral system is needed to cut across the country’s ethnoreligious and regional identities. Decentralizing and devolving more authority to the states, as well as restoring city elections, could also encourage moderation among opposition parties by offering them more opportunities to have some executive powers and access to resources.

In the meantime, Malaysians must realize that there can be no good government if there is no good opposition. And Pakatan Harapan must realize that the best thing it can do for Malaysia’s democracy is what Barisan Nasional never did: protect its adversaries.

Chin-Huat Wong is a political scientist with the Penang Institute, a state-government think tank.

Sara Petra: Daughter of Raja Petra Kamarudin


Sara Petra: I need the youth to understand that circumstances change with time

March 11, 2018 

Raggie Jessy

Sara Petra gave The Third Force on the 3rd of March 2018. The interview follows a decision by the daughter of Raja Petra Kamarudin to contest the Segambut parliamentary seat using the Gerakan ticket this coming general election (GE14)

THE THIRD FORCE

Give us a little background about yourself, Sara. Where were you born, where did you grow up, what is your educational background and what did you do before deciding to join the political fray?

Well, I graduated from the London Middlesex University with a Bachelors (Hons) in Marketing Communications right after I completed my Diploma in Multimedia, Advertising & Broadcasting at the Limkokwing University of Creative Technology. I was with the advertising/branding industry for six years before I decided to follow in the footsteps of three generations of my family and serve the country I was born in.

Oh, and lest I forget, I was born in Terengganu, in a kampung next to a beautiful river where 80% of the population comprises fishermen and farmers. But I grew up in Kuala Lumpur.

Tell us how you became interested in politics. What were your early experiences, and what drove you to consider contesting the election?

I think it had a lot to do with my dad. You know, I grew up watching him get arrested and go in and out of jail. Can you imagine what that felt like, seeing the man you look up to having to go through all that agony?

During a TV interview with ABC Australia, I told the host that I did not understand why my father was doing what he did and what good that brought the family. Today, 20 years on, I totally understand that every Malaysian, like the three generations before me, must do their bit for Malaysia. I have my mother to thank for that also.

You see, it was she who taught me to see things through the lenses of objectivity back when my father was arrested. Because of her, I did not end up being a rebel without a cause like the children of some other politicians who whine just about everything rather than working towards nation building. They talk about reform, but all I see them do is deform.

It is with this awareness that I decided to join politics. I need the youth to understand that circumstances change with time, that at the end of the day, our mission is to contribute towards nation building as a Malaysian race and not to point fingers at others without lifting even one for the country.

Why did you choose Gerakan? 

My grandfather, Raja Kamarudin bin Raja Sir Tun Uda, voted for Gerakan in 1969 in spite of my great-grandfather being the Governor of Penang and very close to Tunku Abdul Rahman and Tun Razak Hussein, PM Najib’s father. And the reason he voted for Gerakan, and not for Umno, was because he believed in a multi-racial Malaysia. That was almost 50 years ago!

So it is logical that if I choose to go into politics, it would be through a multi-racial party. But I would prefer if we can call Gerakan a non-racial party rather than a multi-racial party because the term multi-racial itself is racial.

Some ask me why not DAP, which is also a multi-racial party. Who says DAP is a multi-racial party? DAP’s P. Ramasamy, the Penang Deputy Chief Minister 2, did say, “The question is how to cripple the DAP, the strongest non-Malay opposition front in the country; the party that has rendered other non-Malay political parties within the BN totally ineffective.”

So you see, a very senior man in DAP himself admited that Pakatan Harapan is a “non-Malay opposition front” while DAP “has rendered other non-Malay political parties within the BN totally ineffective.” DAP admits it is non-Malay and Pakatan Harapan is also a non-Malay opposition front. So how can you say DAP, or even Pakatan Harapan, is multi-racial? It is not multi-racial. It is non-Malay-centric.

Friday, 10 August 2018

UMNO throwing Najib under the bus

UMNO throwing Najib under the bus

August 11, 2018 Raggie Jessy

Raja Sara Petra

It looks like many of the top Umno leaders are now trying to distance themselves from Najib Tun Razak and are throwing him under the bus. This is not only typical to Umno but is the characteristic of most politicians in general, which is a normal human instinct — that is to associate themselves with the winner and not with the loser.

They say Najib is damaged goods, old history, no longer relevant, and much more. They said that about Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in 1988 and about Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 2003. But then Abdullah bounced back to become Prime Minister in 2003 while Mahathir came back as Prime Minister 15 years later in 2018.

The saying is, a politician is not yet finished until you lay him or her in his grave. So in that sense Najib is far from finished. As some have rightly pointed out, Najib is a victim of negative perception, which is why Umno and Barisan Nasional lost GE14. While everyone knows that, what is puzzling is why did Umno allow that to happen?

There are those in Umno who wanted Najib to fall. But what they did not realise is by allowing Najib to fall that also resulted in Umno and Barisan Nasional falling as well. This, they did not expect. They thought if Najib fell then they could take over Umno. Well, it worked, except that the Umno they have taken over is an Umno in opposition and struggling to keep its head above water.

Let this be a lesson to these people. When your team captain loses, the whole team loses, and this includes you as well. Umno kept quiet from 2015 to 2018 and did not come to Najib’s aid. They thought they would play safe so that if Najib falls then only Najib will fall and not them. Well, GE14 has proven how wrong they were. So stop trying to push the blame entirely to Najib when you are all also to blame.

Nooryana Najwa Najib: My father could not let down someone who stood by him

My father could not let down someone who stood by him

Nooryana Najwa Najib

9 Aug 2018, 7:19 pm 

(Updated 9 Aug 2018, 7:41 pm)

COMMENT | Over the past couple of days, there has been a lot of talk about DSN's (Najib Abdul Razak) role in the Sungai Kandis by-election and Umno as a whole.

Should he have made an appearance in Sungai Kandis? Should he have spoken? Should he have kept quiet and sat on the sidelines while he cleared his name? Or is he simply “excess baggage” that Umno can't afford...

I have to admit these are valid talking points and concerns. Don't think for a second that these are questions that do not cross DSN's mind because he grapples with them almost on a daily basis.

When the question arose whether DSN should appear in Sungai Kandis, some of DSN's closest confidants cautioned him that the party could blame him for the loss. Some advised DSN to think of his own reputation first.

At the same time, BN's candidate Lokman Noor Adam appealed to DSN to come down and make an appearance. Naturally, DSN felt a little reluctant at first. He had not been out on the road since GE14. Would the ground respond to his presence?

Eventually, he took that brave step.

On a personal level, he could not say no or disappoint his fellow comrade who was brave enough to galvanise support during most trying times. Even I, as DSN's daughter, who has no political position whatsoever, felt responsible to show some support to Lokman because he spoke out against the authorities' unethical act of freezing my baby's bank account (later quickly reversed by the authorities when it became public news) and seizing Adam's personal items.

He was one of the few who stood outside the MACC building the night dad was taken in. As a daughter, worried for her father's safety, I felt relieved there was a group of DSN's supporters who wanted to show that he wasn't alone in this battle to clear his name.

When someone goes against the grain to stand up for your family, wouldn’t you feel obliged to return the favour if he or she needs a helping hand? It's only natural that we reciprocate other people's thoughtful deeds.

'He is a tough man'

On a more professional level, DSN's appearance in Sungai Kandis was a reflection of his first love and do what he loves most - spending time with the rakyat.

It was never going to be an easy battle to win in Sg Kandis. The seat was not for PKR to lose as they were the incumbent and their winning margin was big in GE14. To compound matters, a demoralised BN machinery that came so soon from the devastating GE14 loss was a shadow of its previous self. Umno grassroots members tried to do their best but the other component parties were not able to reach out to the 30 percent non-Malay voters there.

In hindsight, he could have put his circumstances first - sit back, let his fellow comrades fight and potentially lose a battle as long as he comes out of it unscathed.

But, he would have done this at the expense of letting down someone who wanted and needed his help. And he did enjoy meeting and spending time with many of his emotional supporters on the ground there - some of whom actually cried and hugged DSN.

Attendance at the two ceramah he did was also decent and showed that there were those who still wanted to listen to what he had to say despite the relentless allegations, persecution and slandering by the Pakatan Harapan government. He certainly has the right to defend himself against those allegations and tell his side of the story.

This is DSN. When anyone asks for help, as long as the request is reasonable, he has never put his needs first. It's always about the other person asking for help. He has never abandoned the rakyat, companions, and comrades in challenging times although today, some may be doing just that.

For most of his life, DSN has tried to serve the people of Malaysia and make their lives better and the nation better and stronger.

As a daughter who could barely get enough time to see him, I can tell you how punishing his daily schedule is - seven days a week, from dawn until late into the night.

Yes, times are tough now but DSN is a tough man who is secure in the knowledge that the only thing he is guilty of is trying to do his best for his country but was made the main political target by those who wanted power for themselves.

NOORYANA NAJWA NAJIB is the daughter of former premier Najib Abdul Razak

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.